Follow us on Twitter Follow us on FaceBook Kitplanes Videos Get RSS Feed
 

Miscellaneous

June 29, 2009




Ask the DAR:Requirements for a builder’s log.

Question: What are the requirements for my builder’s log? Does it have to be extremely detailed? What, as a DAR, are you looking for?

Answer: The requirements for a builder’s log are minimal. The primary purpose of the log is to show the inspector that you did indeed build the aircraft. And, in all honesty, any inspector will know if you built the aircraft after talking with you for just a few minutes. He will ask questions that you could not easily answer if you had not done the work yourself. Here’s a hint: If you are constructing in a “builder’s assistance center” and the inspector asks you a question about a particular part of the construction, you should not turn and look at the building instructor or assistant for guidance at this point.

Electronic logbook entries are acceptable, and may make it easier to tally hours devoted to various parts of the build. However, the DAR usually isn’t interested in a builder-hours breakdown. It’s more important that you know enough about the airplane to be convincing as the true builder.

That’s the subjective end of the argument. Let’s look at the details. FAA Order 8130.2F paragraph 147 addresses the builder’s log requirements. It basically states that the builder should document construction phases using photographs taken at appropriate times prior to covering or finishing. The photographs should clearly show the methods of construction and quality of workmanship, and they should also contain images of you performing the work. Such photographic records should be included with the builder’s log or other construction records. The log needs to be chronological, showing when each process was done. There are no requirements to show how much time was spent, just a reasonable time span.

Your builder’s log should also show at what points your project was inspected by EAA technical counselors, A&P mechanics, experienced builders or other knowledgeable people. The record should show the inspector’s name, what he/she inspected, and any comments and suggestions that were made. If these inspections were made by an EAA tech counselor, you will have been given a copy of the report. These reports should be made a part of your log. (Note: Just because the FAA no longer requires a “pre-cover” inspection, that doesn’t mean you should dismiss outside help. It’s always a good idea to have other experienced eyes on your project.)

The medium used for the builder’s log is up to you. You may use a looseleaf or spiral-bound notebook. Some people mark up their construction plans with dates. Recently more builders are using a computer log, which is fine by me. These should be backed up with a hard copy, as computer files can sometimes “disappear” without reason.

The builder’s log should become a permanent part of your aircraft maintenance records. The FAA may also want to see your builder’s log when you apply for your Repairman Certificate.

A Matter of Tone

I received an email from a reader who said that this comment in the March issue sounded arrogant: “Now if you disagree with the inspector about anything or refuse to correct a problem that was found, the DAR must deny the airworthiness certificate.”

After talking with the individual, I had to agree with his interpretation of my tone. I realize that the statement should have been presented differently. What I should have said is: If you disagree with the inspector and cannot come to an agreement as to the interpretation of the applicable FARs, then he must deny the airworthiness certificate. If you disagree with the inspector, ask him to show you the applicable rule or regulation he is using as a basis for his decision. If he can show you the reg, and he should be able to, then you will be allowed to correct the discrepancy and continue the inspection.

The “must deny” comment was meant to convey that once the DAR accepts an 8130-6 (airworthiness application), he cannot simply walk away. He must either deny the certificate or issue it.

When KITPLANES® asked me to write these articles, I stated that, “I'm not a writer, but I'm willing to learn.” [Mel is being far too modest. He has a clarity of thought and expression many so-called professional writers would do well to emulate.—Ed.] Well, I'm still learning. I have a saying that I often use: “When we stop learning, it's over!” I hope to continue learning for some time. If you disagree with any information presented in my articles, by all means, please let me know. It's much easier to find my mistakes if they are pointed out to me.

Please send your questions for DAR Asberry to editorial@kitplanes.com with “Ask the DAR” in the subject line.

Download File

Untitled Document Homebuilder's Portal by KITPLANES
Photo by Richard VanderMeulen
Leedom-Hlavac-KitFox-LiteN200HL started life as a KitFox Lite kit. The engine is a Rotax 503 with a 3.47:1 reduction. The motor mount, carbon full cowl and the gear legs with coil spring absorption are all original designs. Mounted to the 503 is a 70" Warp Drive 3-blade prop and spinner. Standard-grade aircraft tires with hydraulic disc …
Darrell Anderson VanAfter on-and-off construction started in November, 1991, N144DV took to the air on July 4, 2016. (Yes, that's 25 years into a 3-year project!) A little over a year later, with only 50 hours on the Hobbs, I flew it from Montana to Oshkosh AirVenture 2017. I was honored to be awarded a Bronze Lindy …
Dave Armando Kitfox Speedster Model VAfter 6 years of building my 2001 Kitfox Speedster Model V was flown. Equipped with a Jabiru 3300 120 hp 6 cylinder, swinging an IVO medium constant speed prop, my own designed smoke system, Grove gear, Maule tail wheel, removable wing tips with a fishing pole locker inside, Super Bee lithium battery for weight reduction, …

lycoming-thunderbolt-o-360-redAt Sun 'n Fun 2018 we interviewed Jeff Schans, Lycoming's Sales manager and we asked about the popular Thunderbolt Engines. Watch the short Product Minute video as Jeff describes the benefits of the Thunderbolt product line and what it means for the aircraft homebuilder.
Dynon Avionics' latest-generation SkyView integrated avionics called the SkyView HDX has a newly designed bezel and user controls for easier use while flying in turbulence, plus brighter displays and a reworked touch interface. Larry Anglisano takes a product tour of the HDX with Dynon's Michael Schoefield in this video.
At Sun 'n Fun 2016, Dynon continued to push into the world of non-certified avionics with its SkyView SE, a less expensive version of its popular SkyView EFIS system. Paul Bertorelli prepared this video report.
The G5 is a self-contained electronic flight instrument, which can be interfaced with Garmin's G3X/Touch avionics and autopilot for backup and flight instrument redundancy. The GMA245 and remote GMA245R Bluetooth audio panels have advanced entertainment input functions and onscreen programming.
At Sun 'n Fun 2016, Just Aircraft is showing off its new Titan-powered SuperSTOL XL. Harrison Smith took Paul Bertorelli for a half-day demo flight in the new airplane, and here's his video report.
Kit manufacturer Zenith Aircraft Company has released a new 360-degree VR short video to showcase its kit aircraft and to promote the rewarding hobby of kit aircraft building and flying light-sport aircraft.
Video Archive

IMPORTANT CUSTOMER SERVICE NOTICE TO KITPLANES SUBSCRIBERS:


All mailed correspondence, including subscription invoices, renewals, and gift notices, will bear our address:
PO BOX 8535
Big Sandy, TX 75755

Third parties claiming to be selling KITPLANES subscriptions are not legitimate.