Follow us on Twitter Follow us on FaceBook Kitplanes Videos Get RSS Feed
 

Miscellaneous

June 29, 2009




Ask the DAR: Engine-run requirements for the DAR inspection.

Question: Do I have to run my engine for the DAR?

Answer: This will depend on your particular DAR. Many require a run at inspection time; others don’t. I would say offhand that most do. Your engine should have at least 1 hour run time before the inspection. If you have a factory-built engine, they should have run the engine in a test cell and provided you with a “run sheet.” They typically will have run the engine for more than an hour. The run sheet should show oil temperature and pressure, rpm drop for left and right ignition systems, cylinder head temperatures, full-power rpm and run time.

Whether you will be asked to run your engine for the DAR depends on several factors. If the engine has been run before, on an airplane or a dyno, you may not have to run it again for the DAR. However, there are exceptions to every rule.

In many cases, a builder will purchase a used engine and overhaul it. Because Experimental aircraft are not required to have a certified engine, the builder, or anyone else, may perform the overhaul. This is really not the best scenario. Now you have an untested engine on an untested airframe, each of which needs totally different initial operation. The engine should be run hard for the first few hours for break-in, whereas the airframe needs to be operated over a wide range of speeds, most of which are on the lower end. Which are you going to do? My recommendation is if you have a used engine that runs OK, install it and test the aircraft. After the aircraft is proven, then overhaul the engine. This is exactly what I did with my RV. I bought a high-time (2500 hours) O-320 that had a good run sheet and flew behind it for almost 300 hours before I overhauled it.

If you have overhauled your engine and it has not been run in, you should at least run it enough to verify that oil pressure is correct, all engine controls operate as designed, all engine instruments work properly, and there are no leaks or anomalies. If you have a controllable propeller, that needs to be tested as well. Obviously a newly overhauled engine should not be run excessively on the ground unless you have access to a proper test cell. Airplane cowlings are designed for in-flight cooling and are not optimized for ground operation.

Now back to the original question of “Do I have to?” My inspection checklist contains the following:

  1. Check proper operation of engine controls—throttle, mixture, carb heat/alt air, and prop governor.
  2. Check brakes for adequacy at high power setting.
  3. Check engine instrument operation.
  4. Check carb heat/alt air for proper operation.
  5. Check static rpm.
  6. Check ignition drop for individual ignition systems.
  7. Check oil pressure for normal range.

If I feel good about the overall inspection before we get to the part where we must run the engine to check the next item off the list, I may not ask for an engine run. If you have an unusual engine installation, an auto engine conversion or anything not recommended by the aircraft designer, then I’m probably going to ask you to run the engine.

A certified engine and approved prop combination like this O-320 and Sensenich fixed-pitch propeller must be unmodified from certified configuration for the project to be eligible for a 25-hour fly-off.

Question: I have acquired a Lycoming O-320-E2A engine for my Van’s RV-9A project. The engine came off of a flying Piper that was storm damaged. I have all the logs and AD compliances, etc. Would this be considered a “certified” engine? If so, and if I mated it with a Sensenich prop from Van’s, which the company says is certified, would this prop and my engine qualify the plane for a 25-hour Phase I test period?

Answer: As long as the engine has been maintained according to its type certificate and you don't make any changes such as aftermarket electronic ignition and/or fuel injection, your engine should be considered as certified. If you use the certified Sensenich prop, you should get a 25-hour test period.

You need to talk with whatever inspector you plan to use, as the inspector can give you more than 25 hours if he is not comfortable with your installation—the shorter test period, even with a certified engine, is not a given.

Question: You state that the reason a homebuilt aircraft cannot be used for flight training is that the aircraft’s operating limitations state the aircraft cannot be used to carry persons or property for compensation or hire.

But the FARs state (preamble to P-135) that there are several activities that are not to be construed as carrying persons or property for compensation or hire. Real close to the top of the list of those exempted activities is dual flight instruction. I’m not saying that homebuilts can be used for dual without a specific exemption, just that this “carrying persons or property for compensation for hire” reason is not correct. Care to comment?

Answer: I forwarded your comments to FAA, AFS 640 in Oklahoma City. This is the Designee Standardization Branch that provides us DARs with guidance each year. Here is the response:

“If the instructor provides the aircraft and charges me for the airplane AND his instruction, that could be construed as compensation or hire, and we can not use an amateur-built airplane for this purpose. That is why the 141 flight schools are using TC’d aircraft for instruction, rather than Experimental aircraft. No Experimental aircraft can be used for flight instruction, where the student is paying for the instructor and the airplane. The reference to ‘P-135’ makes no sense to me, with respect to a preamble or amendment to a regulation. Normally an amendment to a regulation, which is often referred to as a preamble, is the regulation number followed by the amendment number, such as Amendment 21-20. This is the 21st amendment to Part 21. P-135 does not correlate to a regulation and would be impossible to find with only that number. A preamble to Part 91 would seem to me as the appropriate regulation that may contain information regarding this subject. The preamble to a regulation is the explanation of the regulation published in the Federal Register at the time the regulation becomes final. This is actually the Amendment to the regulation and explains the FAA writers’ views of the subject matter and why they came to the conclusions they did. This conclusion is based on comments received from industry and persons affected by the regulation that were received when the Notice of Purposed Rulemaking (NPRM) was released.”

In addition, the first statement of the operating limitations for amateur-built aircraft states that: “No person may operate this aircraft for other than the purpose of meeting the requirements of part 91.319(b) during Phase I flight testing, and for recreation and education after meeting these requirements as stated in the program letter (required by 14 CFR, part 21.193) for this aircraft.”

Please send your questions for DAR Asberry to editorial@kitplanes.com with “Ask the DAR” in the subject line.

Download File

Untitled Document Homebuilder's Portal by KITPLANES
Photo by Richard VanderMeulen
After many years of both building and not building (about 50/50) N184GC (One RV-8 for Grandpa Christensen) and I made the maiden flight on April 22, 2015 from Santa Fe Municipal Airport, Santa Fe, NM. That was prior to paint and empty weight was 1,041 lb. Making the first flight in the airplane I built was …
I completed Sonex #1072 on August 18, 2014 and made the first flight on August 22, 2014 from Charlie Brown/Fulton County Airport in Atlanta, Georgia. The airplane now has over 150 hours on it and has made several trips from Atlanta to South Florida, the Carolinas, and to Tower, Minnesota which is just south of …
My CubCrafters EX N-96FV was finished July 30, 2016 - last weekend of AirVenture. My 87-year old Dad was the first passenger after my 40-hour fly off. He flew chase in his Cherokee for the maiden flight. It's painted in D-Day colors for my C-130 unit's 70th anniversary. 96th Airlift Squadron Flying Vikings were the …

Dynon Avionics' latest-generation SkyView integrated avionics called the SkyView HDX has a newly designed bezel and user controls for easier use while flying in turbulence, plus brighter displays and a reworked touch interface. Larry Anglisano takes a product tour of the HDX with Dynon's Michael Schoefield in this video.
At Sun 'n Fun 2016, Dynon continued to push into the world of non-certified avionics with its SkyView SE, a less expensive version of its popular SkyView EFIS system. Paul Bertorelli prepared this video report.
The G5 is a self-contained electronic flight instrument, which can be interfaced with Garmin's G3X/Touch avionics and autopilot for backup and flight instrument redundancy. The GMA245 and remote GMA245R Bluetooth audio panels have advanced entertainment input functions and onscreen programming.
At Sun 'n Fun 2016, Just Aircraft is showing off its new Titan-powered SuperSTOL XL. Harrison Smith took Paul Bertorelli for a half-day demo flight in the new airplane, and here's his video report.
Kit manufacturer Zenith Aircraft Company has released a new 360-degree VR short video to showcase its kit aircraft and to promote the rewarding hobby of kit aircraft building and flying light-sport aircraft.
Whether you are upgrading the audio system in an older LSA or experimental or building a new project, PS Engineering and Garmin have non-certified audio panels equipped with advanced features better suited for smaller cabins.
Video Archive

IMPORTANT CUSTOMER SERVICE NOTICE TO KITPLANES SUBSCRIBERS:


All mailed correspondence, including subscription invoices, renewals, and gift notices, will bear our address:
PO BOX 8535
Big Sandy, TX 75755

Third parties claiming to be selling KITPLANES subscriptions are not legitimate.