Buying Used: Long-EZ

Construction workmanship varies greatly, so it pays to have experienced eyes look over your temptation before you succumb to its charms.


Over 40 years ago, Burt Rutan set the homebuilt airplane movement on its ear in 1976 with his unusual VariEze design. From its canard foreplane “tail” to its moldless fiberglass construction, the little Eze broke new ground in an age of staid tube-and-rag homebuilts.

Rutan wasn’t the first to build and fly a pusher-type airplane with the tail in front, but he did solve the inherent weaknesses in the concept, flaws that had bedeviled the similar WW-II era Curtiss XP-55 Ascender fighter plane. Rutan’s strength as a designer has always been to find innovative ways to successfully achieve a performance objective or limitation. For instance, when it was evident that the CG of an empty VariEze would cause the powerplant-heavy aft fuselage to drop to the ground, his solution was to make the nosewheel retractable. By cranking it up after disembarking, thereby parking the aircraft in a self-chocking, prayerful position, the awkward storage problem was solved.

Cockpit of Michael Beasley’s nearly completed Long-EZ, with two Dynon HDX displays running. Sidestick is on right, throttle quadrant and canopy latch are on the left.


Burt Rutan’s Long-EZ, as the name implies, was introduced in 1980 as what appeared to be a lengthened version of the original VariEze, but in reality it was a complete redesign, not a simple scaling-up. The little VariEze began as a light Volkswagen-powered airplane, but it was soon optimized with the O-200 Continental pusher configuration. It didn’t take long for builders to want larger engines.

Designed around a Lycoming O-235 engine, the Long-EZ not only had a longer, sleeker fuselage but a larger main wing with less sweep angle. The wing-root strakes were bigger, giving more space for fuel and baggage, and the cockpit was wider. With 52 gallons of fuel, the Long-EZ could stay aloft for as much as 10 hours. The easiest way to discern the two EZs is to look at the wingtip; VariEzes have short protuberances below the wingtips, under the tip rudders, something not usually present on the Long-EZ.

Prefabricated kits for easy assembly were never part of the Rutan Aircraft Factory’s offerings. Plans and instructions were simply sold by RAF, and a bill-of-materials package was offered by major homebuilt supply houses. Thus, the builder is responsible for most all of the work seen in a Long-EZ offered for sale, and it is important to have a knowledgeable EZ builder/owner to help evaluate a purchase.

As with the VariEze, the Long-EZ uses Rutan’s moldless foam-core construction method, a brilliant, simple way to optimize shape by cutting or hot-wiring out a profile from blocks of high-density poly foam, sanding it to exact dimensions and laying on fiberglass and epoxy over the foam, as is done with surfboards. The result is a light, sleek airframe, giving very efficient aerodynamics.

The forward lifting surface, incorporating pitch control, means trim drag is minimized compared to conventional aft-tail aircraft. Stability is also enhanced, providing pleasant cross-country cruise characteristics, and EZs are essentially stall and spin resistant, nodding gently straight ahead when flown at the canard’s critical angle of attack. The Long-EZ’s canard originally used the same airfoil as the VariEze’s, but a newly designed airfoil was introduced in 1985 that allowed the canard span to be reduced and largely eliminated the trim change that was sometimes experienced when flying in rain with the earlier airfoil.

The trade-offs, of course, are the limitations imposed by a pusher engine installation and tailless configuration. Rutan solved stability problems by installing winglets (tip sails) with independently actuating rudders on the end of the swept wings. The rudders can also be deflected simultaneously, acting as air brakes, by depressing both rudder pedals at once. Because of the intentionally imposed limited lifting ability of the canard, required so the main wing cannot ever be stalled in flight, slowing the sleek EZ down for a landing requires deflection of a bellyboard drag surface. Flaps are not available because trailing-edge lift/drag devices would upset the carefully crafted balance between main wing and canard.

The futuristic look of a Long-EZ, even from behind, is one of its strongest appeals.

What to Look For

As with any Experimental/Amateur-Built category aircraft, construction workmanship can vary greatly, so joining and seeking help from canard airplane clubs is important. Because Long-EZs were not assembled from factory-built kits, even though many prefabricated components were available from supply houses in the heyday, it pays to have experienced eyes look over your temptation before you succumb to its charms.

The futuristic logo of the Central States Association newsletter, long a favorite communication and sharing medium for canard aircraft builders and flyers. CSA is now part of the Canard Owners and Builders Association.

Terry Schubert, retired newsletter editor of the Central States Association (the CSA is now part of the Canard Owners and Builders Association as it had become much more than a regional group), gave us a lot of tips about EZ evaluation. He says to carefully consider the empty weight; excessive weight can’t be fixed. Added poundage impacts performance and it compromises the G-load safety margin. He says an O-235 powered Long-EZ ought to come in at 850 pounds, without a starter, and he wouldn’t consider one that weighs 1000 pounds as it would be a single-place plane most of the time. One with an O-320 engine ought to weigh less than 1050 pounds.

Then look the airplane over in good light, but not in glaring sunshine that hides imperfections. Look for rounded bulges in the finish that might indicate a delamination of glass from the foam core, which can only get worse under flight loads. With the nose gear retracted, stand at the rear and observe the underside of both wings; the amount of exposed areas visible should match, and if they don’t there may be an issue with one side’s angle of incidence. There should be no bare glass on surfaces exposed to sunlight, which invites UV damage. Paint should not be coming loose, which is probably a result of poor priming and may need removal and recontouring to fix. EZs are better off painted white or very pale yellow due to the room-temperature cure construction; heat soaked up by dark colors weakens the structure.

The nylon brake lines need to be checked for flexibility, even if shielded by insulation and heat shields, as they stiffen with age. Schubert likes to stick with two-blade composite propellers for their durability, efficiency and one-third less susceptibility to FOD. It’s important that the fuel caps have restraining metal chains, he says, both for static electricity and to prevent their loss in flight, straight back into the propeller.

Schubert cautions against buying any airplane that has been operated on alcohol-based fuel, which attacks the tanks in the strakes. Watch for blisters and soft lumps in the tank structure, which are challenging to repair. A later mod changed the system from two vent lines to four; if there’s more than 15 gallons in a tank with the original vents, there will be venting of fuel overboard from expansion while parked nose down. The solution is to fuel up just before departure. The Long-EZ’s direct-reading sight gauges are unfailing indicators of fuel level.

As with all airplanes, the engine should have been given frequent flying to get the oil up to 180° F to prevent rusting; Schubert says to pull the dipstick and look under the cap for signs of rust. He also wants to look at the four exhaust pipes for unmatched deposits and oily residue. Cylinder head temperature probes should be installed and working to keep a careful check on the pusher engine’s cooling health, and the cowling should fit tightly to prevent loss of cooling air. See if there’s a cabin heating system installed; not all EZs have them because the greenhouse canopy traps plenty of warmth, but one will be needed at 10,000 feet msl.

Mike Sabourin’s Long-EZ is shown in the main photos.

The control system should be checked for flutter-inducing looseness, including the rudder return springs, and the elevators need to be noted as having been balanced in the logbook. There should not be any trim tabs added to the elevators or other controls if properly built. The rudders come in two sizes, partial and full length; the later are termed “high performance” rudders.

Canard style is a debate among knowledgeable and not-so-knowledgeable EZ “experts.” The original Long-EZ plans called for the same GU25-5(11)8 canard airfoil that was used on the VariEze, which could exhibit some pitch-down trim change if flown in rain and required a few extra knots for takeoff and approach if rain was present. In 1985, plans for a canard with a John Roncz R1145MS airfoil were introduced, which largely eliminated the trim change. Some Long-EZs have vortex generators added to the upper surface as an alternate fix. As Schubert points out, some of the original canards may not have been well contoured and therefore have no laminar flow to be disrupted by rain, thus exhibiting none of the pitch-down tendency.

Engine Options

If in pursuit of maximum performance, a Long-EZ builder will have opted for a Lycoming O-320, or even an O-360 for another 12 pounds of weight. Because the airplane was designed for the lighter O-235, the bigger engine and associated systems require some attention to CG and perhaps weight savings in other areas. Just make sure the airplane under consideration hasn’t had the bigger engine installed without documenting the change in the logs and limitations.

If sticking with the O-235 for lightness and economy, while still enjoying impressive speed, some builders leave off the starter and install a lightweight wood propeller. There’s certainly nothing wrong with flying at 160 knots on 115 hp, although the climb rate will be slower than with an O-320.

Many Long-EZ builders have tried automotive engine conversions, including Mazda rotaries, and two-time builder Bob Holliston cautions against considering one, saying that they are four times as much trouble and are almost never successful. Stick with the tried-and-true airplane motors.

Terry Schubert’s Long-EZ engine installation is artfully revealed in this double-exposure shot, taken before and after the cowling was installed.

Common Modifications

As with all E/A-B scratch-built designs, Long-EZs are often customized by their builders, which is why it pays to have a knowledgeable canard-airplane expert help you evaluate a potential purchase. Some add-ons or changes are beneficial, some are harmless, and some can be dangerous.

Vortex generators, added to the forward or main wings, may provide some benefit if installed correctly. A Davenport-type coil spring shimmy damper on the nose gear is much preferred over the plans version damper, according to Terry Schubert. Not all Long-EZs have a boarding step to assist in climbing over the side, which would seem worthwhile. An electrically powered nose gear extension system, versus the standard manual crank, adds some weight, which is always the enemy of structural safety and performance. Most, but not all, Long-EZs will have a cabin heating system of some sort (exhaust muff, oil radiator, electric socks), depending on their region of origin.

Canard airfoil modification, aka the Roncz canard, to minimize the effect of flying in rain, would not usually be seen on early built (pre-1985) Long-EZs. The Roncz canard is shorter in span, adds a couple of knots to the stall speed and is slightly heavier. Replacing the original canard with the redesigned one is possible, with considerable work, but not critical for most operators.

Flight Characteristics

Long-EZs are wonderful cross-country traveling machines, albeit somewhat snug and limited on storage space; using moldable soft luggage stuffed in the strakes is the key. They are stable and have long legs, burning less fuel for the distance than just about any other two-seat airplane. Forward visibility, particularly on approach, is obviously impacted by the canard.

If you’re looking for short-field and unimproved airport capability, you’ll want to buy something else. The airplane’s small tires, relatively high liftoff and touchdown speeds, and the possibility of FOD damage to the pusher propeller do not lend EZs to STOL operation. Their strength is in efficient transportation.

The characteristic praying-mantis tie-down position means you will begin by lifting the nose and reaching inside to crank the nose gear down. It takes 8.6 turns to extend the gear over center and lock it in place; watch for the nose to rise and then dip slightly at the end of the cycle, indicating that the gear did go over center. Hold on and climb aboard to add the human ballast; hopefully, there will be a boarding step installed.

If you haven’t hand-propped the engine before boarding, check and announce for a clear prop to the rear before cranking up. Canopy latching is critical; there should be a warning system to alert you to an unlatched canopy before takeoff. By the same token, the full bubble makes a great greenhouse in hot weather, so you’ll want to leave it cracked for taxiing. Brakes, of course, are necessary for steering, so check them early and often.

Comfortable seating and storage room in the strakes are cockpit features of the Long-EZ.

Once the engine runup and the sidestick and rudder controls are verified, recheck the canopy latching and swing into position to launch. When the canard comes to life and the nose can lift off, gain another 10 mph and the main wing will break ground. The canard makes a great attitude reference for climbout. Climbing doesn’t take long, with 1500 fpm rates with small engines and 2000 fpm or more with the bigger Lycomings. For best efficiency, get the EZ up to 10,000 feet msl where it does its finest work. For the O-235 engine expect to see 150 to 160 knots TAS at normal flight levels and upwards of 200 knots with O-320/O-360 installations.

Descent planning starts well out from the destination; the sleek Long-EZ doesn’t want to come down and slow down. There should be a nose gear-up warning to get your attention with the power back. Extend the belly board for the approach and keep a sharp eye out for lower and slower airplanes ahead. The touchdown comes at 65 mph or so as the main wing quits flying, and then it’s time to get on the brakes for slowing and steering.

Strake mounting the electrical panel is handy and frees up instrument panel space.

Disembarking is the reverse of mounting; an occupant in the rear seat simplifies the urgency of lowering the nose to prevent a tip-up. A postflight inspection of the rear-mounted engine compartment is a good idea, since you’re not walking past it at the nose.


The Rutan Aircraft Factory ceased operation in 2004. Plans remain available in unused and partially used state from former builders, so there are still some new Long-EZs being added to the 700 or so registered in the U.S. Support is found among the membership of the Canard Owners and Builders Association, Squadron III, and the Rutan Aircraft Flying Experience (RAFE) organization website. TERF Inc. has secured the rights to publish all former RAF materials for the guidance of owners and builders.

Photos: Marc Cook and courtesy of the Long-EZ owners


  1. This is a well organized and truthful article with input from knowledgeable pilots and builders. Everyone interested in efficient fast cross country airplanes would be well advised to read it.

    The digital offering of 34 years of Central States Association Newsletter is currently available.
    Contact me for details. [email protected] Thank you,

    Terry Schubert 4485 hours in Long-EZ N9TS
    Editor, publisher, writer Central States Association Newsletter

  2. Awesome article Mr. Cook! I would like to invite anyone contemplating buying a Long-EZ or any other canard join the Canard Owners and Builder’s Association (COBA). COBA represents over 500 canard owners and builders and its forum and his companion publication, Central States Association Magazine, are important resources to help buy, fly, and maintain this wonderful aircraft (or any other canard). Visit or contact Mike Beasley at [email protected] for more information. We offer both a hard copy magazine (most members prefer) or digital only versions, along with all the features of our website.
    Mike Beasley
    Editor, Central States Association Magazine
    A publication of COBA

  3. Very good article. There were more Long-EZs built than Boeing 737s – lots of them out there flying too – because they are hangared for the most part, so you don’t see them unless they are in motion.

    If looking for the best ones, consider contacting me. I can find most of the canards for sale, and steer you to really good inspectors – often nearby. Don’t restrict yourself to the local area – get the best one you can find.
    David Orr
    Point Man for The Canard Squadron – including Long EZ, Varieze, Cozy, Velocity, Berkut, Defiant, E-Racer

    • David,
      I need someone to consult me on a Long EZ project in Cental California. To me, it appears ‘near complete’, but I need help determining if it’s for me.

    • Hi David, It was about 1980 that I started my Long EZ. The “registration”. number of the factory was # 612. I ordered just about all the parts and hardware that were available from suppliers at that time and the following years, except the engine mount since I was contemplating the O-320 rather then the O-235. In the following year I built the fuselage, the wings/canard and spar. The initial FAA inspection was done. Then I acquired a Piper Cherokee and my building efforts seized. In the pursuing decades I built three times a 30 ft. structure that would hold the project, ( the last one my living room), but I never got back to building. The canopy is untouched, so are the engine and wheel covers. The canard is of the original design as are the speed brakes. I have no instruments, but the instrument holes are drilled as in the original plans.
      I am now moving out of the country and want my project to go to an active builder. Could you help me?
      [email protected] 24 May, 2023

  4. I saw Marc Cook’s correction in the latest issue (Editor’s Notes). I need to correct the correction: the plans call for the lower winglets seen on Mike Sabourin’s Long-EZ. Some Long-EZs are winglet-less because they were removed or omitted during construction. While the airplane looks sleeker without them, I’ve been told that they add stability at low speed/high angle of attack.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.